|
STYLE MANUAL |
|
SPECIFIED HERE |
| Manuscript preparation. All manuscripts and correspondence should be addressed to the Editor. The Virginia Journal of Science welcomes for consideration original articles and short notes in the various disciplines of engineering and science. Cross-disciplinary papers dealing with advancements in science and technology and the impact of these on man and society are particularly welcome. Submission of an article implies that the article has not been published elsewhere while under consideration by the Journal. Three complete copies of each manuscript and figures are required. It is also suggested that authors include a diskette in PC format containing a text file (ASCII, MSWord or WordPerfect) of the manuscript. Original figures need not be sent at this time. Authors should submit names of three potential reviewers. All manuscripts must be double-spaced. Do not use special effects such as bold or large print. The title, author's name, affiliation and address should be placed on a covering page. Include a suggested running head of not more than 36 characters and spaces. Figures should be identified on the back with the appropriate Figure number and author's name and Figure captions should be on a separate page at the end of the text. Each figure and table should be mentioned specifically in the text, in numbered order. When formatting Tables and Figures, consider the Journal's column size (4.5 X 7.5 inches), since reduction or enlargement may be required. |
| Length: Ten to 20 pages is usual. Longer manuscripts should be discussed with the Editor. |
| Typing:
|
General style
|
| Symbols, acronyms, spelling and measurement.
|
Illustrations and figures:
|
Tables.
|
Disk submission
|
|
Written reports exist for a long time and yield long-term benefits for the author and others. Learning to write effectively can only be learned by writing. For this reason, most papers submitted by new scientists receive many comments and usually require rewriting. Papers submitted by senior scientists usually require few corrections. Scientific research is a group activity. Individual scientists perform experiments to test hypotheses about biological phenomena. After their experiments are completed and duplicated, these researchers attempt to persuade others to accept or reject their hypotheses. The scientific paper is the vehicle of persuasion and an archival record for future generations. When it is published, it is available to other scientists for review. If the results stand up to criticism, they become part of the accepted body of scientific knowledge unless later disproved. A scientific report usually consists of the following:
|
There is general agreement among scientists that each section of the report should contain specific types of information.
|
Abstract The purpose of an abstract is to allow the reader to judge whether it would serve his or her purposes to read the entire report. A good abstract is a concise (100 to 250 words) summary of the purpose of the report, the data presented, and the author's major results and conclusions. Write the abstract after completing the rest of the report, even though the abstract comes just after the title. The abstract should never contain images or reference citations. |
Introduction The introduction defines the subject of the report. It must outline the scientific purpose(s) or objective(s) for the research performed and give the reader sufficient background to understand the rest of the report and what has been done previously. Care should be taken to limit the background to whatever is pertinent to the experiment. A good introduction will answer several questions, including the following:
|
Materials and Methods As the name implies, the materials and methods used in the experiments should be reported in this section. The difficulty in writing this section is to provide enough detail for the reader to understand the experiment without overwhelming him or her. When procedures from a lab book or another report are followed exactly, simply cite the work, noting that details can be found in that particular source. However, it is still necessary to describe special pieces of equipment and the general theory of the assays used. This can usually be done in a short paragraph, possibly along with a drawing of the experimental apparatus. Generally, this section attempts to answer the following questions:
|
Results The results section should summarize the data from the experiments without discussing their implications. The data should be organized into tables, figures, graphs, photographs, and so on. But data included in a table should not be duplicated in a figure or graph. This section of your report should enable the reader to develop an appreciation of the general trends in your data and the degree of variability in the results. Concentrate on general trends and differences and not on trivial details. Many authors organize and write the results section before the rest of the report. |
Discussion: In the discussion section, the data collected are interpreted in relation to the hypotheses or purposes proposed in the introduction. Your findings should be related to existing knowledge on the topic. You should also be able to suggest future experiments that might clarify areas of doubt in your results. This section should not just be a restatement of the results, but should stress interpretation of the data, relating it to existing theory and knowledge. Speculation is appropriate if it is so identified. Suggestions for the improvement of techniques or experimental design may also be included here. In writing this section, you should explain the logic that allows you to accept or reject your original hypothese |
| Acknowledgments: In
this section the writer gives
credit for
special assistance received from other sources. Stating
specifically
what assistance was provided (e.g. someone who ran statistical
analysis,
someone who injected animals, etc.) STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY Multi-author papers must have a statement indicating the nature of the participation and responsibility of each author. This will be included as part of the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. |
| Literature cited: All references must be properly cited in the paper. When information belongs to others, they must be given proper credit. Failure to do so is plagiarism. |
The Literature cited is a list of all books, publications,
and communications
from which significant materials were cited in the paper.
|
|
|
Some Examples for Literature Cited: |
| Personal communications, unpublished data, and manuscripts
in preparation
should be cited in the text. The citation should include the source's
name
and affiliation in the following form: (Henry J. Smurd, university or
other
affiliation, city, state, personal communication). Letters should be
available
from authors of personal communications giving permission to cite the
unpublished
data. |
| Journal article: |
| McCaffrey, Cheryl A. and Raymond D. Dueser. 1990. Plant associations of the Virginia barrier islands. Virginia Journal of Science 41:282-299. |
| Bryant, P. J. and P. Simpson. 1984. Intrinsic and extrinsic
control
of growth in developing organs. Quarterly Review of Biology 59:387-
415. |
| Book: |
| Spry, A. 1969. Metamorphic Textures. Pergamon Press, New
York. 350pp. |
| Chapter in book: |
| Southwood, T. R. E. 1981. Bionomic strategies and population
parameters.
Pages 30-52 In May, R. M., ed. Theoretical Ecology. Sunderland
(MA):
Sinauer Associates. |
| Technical report: |
| Lassister, R. R.and J. L. Cooley. 1985. Prediction of
ecological effects
of toxic chemicals, overall strategy and theoretical basis for the
ecosystem
model. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office. Report no.
83-261-685.
Available from: National Technical Information Service, Springfield,
VA. |
| Meeting paper: |
| Kleiman, R. L. P., R. S. Hedin and H. M. Edenbom. 1991.
Biological
treatment of minewater--an overview. Paper presented at the Second
International
Conference on Abatement of Acid Drainage. 16-18 Sep 1991. Montreal,
Canada. |
| Online article: |
| Grissino-Mayer, H. D. 1997. Ultimate Web pages about tree
rings and
tree-ring research. <http://www.valdosta.edu/-grissino> (4
November
1997).
Stærkeby, Morten. 2000. Introduction to forensic
entomology |
| Additional
information on citation format |
Appendix: This section contains raw data too lengthy to include in the results section of the text but important for an understanding of the entire paper.
|