|
|
|
|
| Manuscript preparation. Submit an original and four copies of all manuscripts. Authors must obtain written permission to use in their articles any material copyrighted by another author or publisher. Winners may be required to supply photo copies of letters granting permission; be sure that credit to the source is complete. The manuscript may include black & white photographs, drawings, figures, or tables. |
| Length:
|
| Typing:
|
General style
|
| Symbols, acronyms, spelling and measurement.
|
Illustrations and figures:
|
Tables.
|
Disk submission
|
|
Written reports exist for a long time and yield long-term benefits for the author and others. Learning to write effectively can only be learned by writing. For this reason, most papers submitted by new scientists receive many comments and usually require rewriting. Papers submitted by senior scientists usually require few corrections. Scientific research is a group activity. Individual scientists
perform
experiments to test hypotheses about physical phenomena. After their
experiments are completed and duplicated, these researchers attempt to
persuade others to accept or reject their hypotheses. The scientific
paper
is the vehicle of persuasion and an archival record for future
generations.
When it is published, it is available to other scientists for review.
If
the results stand up to criticism, they become part of the accepted
body
of scientific knowledge unless later disproved. A scientific report usually consists of the following:
|
There is general agreement among scientists that each section of the report should contain specific types of information.
|
Abstract The purpose of an abstract is to allow the reader to judge whether it would serve his or her purposes to read the entire report. A good abstract is a concise (100 to 250 words) summary of the purpose of the report, the data presented, and the author's major results and conclusions. Write the abstract after completing the rest of the report, even though the abstract comes just after the title. The abstract should never contain images or reference citations. |
Introduction The introduction defines the subject of the report. It must outline the scientific purpose(s) or objective(s) for the research performed and give the reader sufficient background to understand the rest of the report and what has been done previously. Care should be taken to limit the background to whatever is pertinent to the experiment. A good introduction will answer several questions, including the following:
|
Materials and Methods As the name implies, the materials and methods used in the experiments should be reported in this section. The difficulty in writing this section is to provide enough detail for the reader to understand the experiment without overwhelming him or her. When procedures from a lab book or another report are followed exactly, simply cite the work, noting that details can be found in that particular source. However, it is still necessary to describe special pieces of equipment and the general theory of the assays used. This can usually be done in a short paragraph, possibly along with a drawing of the experimental apparatus. Generally, this section attempts to answer the following questions:
|
Results The results section should summarize the data from the experiments without discussing their implications. The data should be organized into tables, figures, graphs, photographs, and so on. But data included in a table should not be duplicated in a figure or graph. This section of your report should enable the reader to develop an appreciation of the general trends in your data and the degree of variability in the results. Concentrate on general trends and differences and not on trivial details. Many authors organize and write the results section before the rest of the report. |
Discussion & Conclusion In the discussion and conclusion section, the data collected are interpreted in relation to the hypotheses or purposes proposed in the introduction. Your findings should be related to existing knowledge on the topic. You should also be able to suggest future experiments that might clarify areas of doubt in your results. This section should not just be a restatement of the results, but should stress interpretation of the data, relating it to existing theory and knowledge. Speculation is appropriate if it is so identified. Suggestions for the improvement of techniques or experimental design may also be included here. In writing this section, you should explain the logic that allows you to accept or reject your original hypotheses. |
| Literature cited. All references must be properly cited in the paper. When information belongs to others, they must be given proper credit. Failure to do so is plagiarism. |
The Literature cited is a list of all books, publications,
and communications
from which significant materials were cited in the paper.
|
|
|
Some Examples for Literature Cited: (Basically APA style except no parentheses around date) |
| Personal communications, unpublished data, and manuscripts
in preparation
should be cited in the text. The citation should include the source's
name
and affiliation in the following form: (Henry J. Smurd, university or
other
affiliation, city, state, personal communication). Letters should be
available
from authors of personal communications giving permission to cite the
unpublished
data. |
| Journal article: |
| McCaffrey, Cheryl A. and Raymond D. Dueser. 1990. Plant associations of the Virginia barrier islands. Virginia Journal of Science 41:282-299. |
| Bryant, P. J. and P. Simpson. 1984. Intrinsic and extrinsic
control
of growth in developing organs. Quarterly Review of Biology 59:387-
415. |
| Book: |
| Spry, A. 1969. Metamorphic Textures. Pergamon Press, New
York. 350pp. |
| Chapter in book: |
| Southwood, T. R. E. 1981. Bionomic strategies and population
parameters.
Pages 30-52 In May, R. M., ed. Theoretical Ecology. Sunderland
(MA):
Sinauer Associates. |
| Dictionary: |
| Sadie, S. (Ed.)
1980. The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. 6th
ed. Vol . I. Macmillian, London. |
| Encyclopedia: |
| If subject is authored- Bergmann, P. G. 1993. Relativity. In The New Encyclopedia Britannica (Vol. 26, pp 501-508). Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago. If not authored, use the subject in place of the author- Relativity. 1993. In The New Encyclopedia Britannica (Vol. 26, pp 501-508). Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago. |
| Technical report: |
| Lassister, R. R.and J. L. Cooley. 1985. Prediction of
ecological effects
of toxic chemicals, overall strategy and theoretical basis for the
ecosystem
model. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office. Report no.
83-261-685.
Available from: National Technical Information Service, Springfield,
VA. |
| Meeting paper: |
| Kleiman, R. L. P., R. S. Hedin and H. M. Edenbom. 1991.
Biological
treatment of minewater--an overview. Paper presented at the Second
International
Conference on Abatement of Acid Drainage. 16-18 Sep 1991. Montreal,
Canada. |
| Online article: |
| Black Death. 2002. In Britannica Online. <
http://www.britannica.com> (22 March 2002) Grissino-Mayer, H. D. 1997. Ultimate Web pages about tree rings and tree-ring research. <http://www.valdosta.edu/-grissino> (4 November 1997). Stærkeby, Morten. 2000. Introduction to forensic
entomology |
| Acknowledgments: In this section the writer gives credit for special assistance received from scientists or other sources. Stating specifically what assistance was provided (e.g. someone who ran statistical analysis, someone who injected animals, etc.) |
Appendix: This section contains raw data too lengthy to include in the results section of the text but important for an understanding of the entire paper.
|